"There are something like twenty thousand CofE places of worship in this country
and of those far more than half are ancient buildings, that is to say each represents
the gradual growth of a community. They are the history of English art displayed
in living form, and most country churches have far more to tell to those who will
look than have the local museums." from Art in Living Form by John Betjeman
CLOSING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS FOR 2008: 3rd March 2008
The Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings invites entries for a competition
to honour the memory of Sir John Betjem an, and to mark his membership of The
Society's Committee from 1954 to 1977. The award will be made for repair to the
fabric of buildings in use as churches and c hapels in England and Wales, which
has been substantially completed during the previous 12 months. The award itself
will take the form of a framed print by John Piper of a church much loved by Sir
John Betjeman, with a suitable inscription.
St. James Church, Dauntsey –Winner of the 2007 John
Betjeman Award
CONDITIONS
1. Entry forms are available on application to the SPAB, 37 Spital Square,
London, E1 6DY, or can be downloaded from the Society’s website www.spab.org.uk
and should normally be signed by the Incumbent or Churchwardens in respect of
Anglican buildings, by the Bishop or Priest in respect of Roman Catholic buildings,
or by the Minister or Elders in respect of Non-Conformist buildings, or their
equal equivalents in the case of other faiths. Cathedrals are not eligible.
2. The entry form should carry a full description of the repair carried
out. It should be accompanied by a report of between 8 to 12 A4 sheets (A3 sheets
are admissible and will be counted as two sheets) comprising of:
· Before, during and after photographs.
· Architect’s and/or engineer’s drawings or extracts where appropriate.
· Any project specific specification clauses of the work required of the
builder or conservator (it is not necessary to include commonplace NBS type clauses).
· Changes to the specification clauses made during the work with reasons
for them.
3. The award is for a specific repair to a single element of the building
and not a general programme of works. Work of repair on any scale will be eligible,
but it must be to the fabric of the building (e.g. spires, towers, roofs, walls,
floors, windows, etc.), or to internal fixed or freestanding significant furnishings
(e.g. murals, monuments, screens, tombs, fixed pews, pulpits, etc). Ordinary repairs
are eligible.
4. The intention is to reward excellence and the highest level of craftsmanship
or conservation in a work of repair and to allow the winning repair work to be
presented as an example to others.
5. Work that enlarges an ecclesiastical building or rearranges its internal
space to accommodate alternative uses will not be eligible.
6. The work must have been substantially completed during the previous calendar
year.
7. All submissions will be examined by three judges at SPAB, and a shortlist
prepared. The judges are chosen by the Guardians and will visit the short-listed
building in the company of a representative of the applicant.
8. The winner may be required to submit, without a fee, a 1500 word article
suitable for publication in Cornerstone, the Society’s magazine, and supported by adequate illustrations, and provide
two A2 size portrait display boards for exhibition purposes.
9. The award is made to the church or chapel and not to any individual responsible
for the work.
10. All applications to be made in hard copy and delivered to SPAB.
11. The judges’ decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into.
INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS
The judges will be looking for work that is firmly based on the principles of
conservative repair advocated by the SPAB since 1877.
Among other criteria they will be looking to see:
· A reasoned argument for the need for the repair work, including the
philosophical basis for the repairs proposed
· Repair techniques formulated in response to a detailed analysis of the
problems
· The appropriateness and honesty of the solution adopted – materials
and detailing
· The extent to which loss of original fabric was limited during the work
· The extent to which “restoration” was avoided
· The quality of craftsmanship and materials used
· Adequate recording and/or monitoring of the work in progress
· The effect of the repair on the rest of the building
The initial shortlist will be made following a review of the materials submitted,
so that it is in your interest to provide focused information. Photographs and
drawings or site sketches by any of the team (architects, engineers, conservators
or craftsmen) are especially important. The architectural quality of the building
is less important than the quality of the repair. It is not essential that the
building is listed as being of architectural interest. The winner will be announced
at the Society’s AGM in the summer, in SPAB Cornerstone magazine and on the SPAB website.