A. Where the
appearance of the roof underside is important, like-for-like replacement is
normally desirable, using, if appropriate, riven laths, oak pegs and torching.
In other situations, the use of sawn
battens, copper or aluminium or nails, or non-ferrous pegs, and possibly
roofing underlay, could be justified, but additional ventilation may be
required. Here, selective courses and verges with peg-tiling are nailed, as
with nib tiles, for wind-resistance. Nails for fixing battens or laths may be
of stainless steel, although screw-fixing is recommended above fragile
ceilings.
Q. How Should Plain Tile Details
be Treated?
A. The emphasis should be on
matching existing details. The detailing of hips, valleys, ridges, dormers,
eaves and abutments should therefore be recorded.
Details
such as tile-and-a-half rather than cut-tile verges may be inappropriate for
pre-Victorian buildings and the lime mortar fillets found on many old roof
abutments usually deserve retention rather than replacement with lead
flashings. Bedding mortar for hand-made tiles should normally be lime-based
(without cement).
Q. How do I Improve Ventilation
with Plain Tile Roofs?
A. Ventilation can be increased
sensitively, but might require innovation. The purpose is to prevent
condensation, thereby minimising the risk of timber decay.
Typical
solutions are proprietary “in-line” vents for ridges, timber pieces between
horizontal underlay laps within roof slopes, and, where standard eaves vents
are not used, ventilation through the soffit or open eaves.
Further Reading
Roof Slating and Tiling, by F Bennett and A Pinion, Donhead, 2000 (reprint of
1948 edition)
© Douglas Kent 2006