A. Where the appearance of the roof underside is important, like-for-like replacement is normally desirable, using, if appropriate, riven laths, oak pegs and torching.
In other situations, the use of sawn battens, copper or aluminium or nails, or non-ferrous pegs, and possibly roofing underlay, could be justified, but additional ventilation may be required. Here, selective courses and verges with peg-tiling are nailed, as with nib tiles, for wind-resistance. Nails for fixing battens or laths may be of stainless steel, although screw-fixing is recommended above fragile ceilings.
Q. How Should Plain Tile Details be Treated?
A. The emphasis should be on matching existing details. The detailing of hips, valleys, ridges, dormers, eaves and abutments should therefore be recorded.
Details such as tile-and-a-half rather than cut-tile verges may be inappropriate for pre-Victorian buildings and the lime mortar fillets found on many old roof abutments usually deserve retention rather than replacement with lead flashings. Bedding mortar for hand-made tiles should normally be lime-based (without cement).
Q. How do I Improve Ventilation with Plain Tile Roofs?
A. Ventilation can be increased sensitively, but might require innovation. The purpose is to prevent condensation, thereby minimising the risk of timber decay.
Typical solutions are proprietary “in-line” vents for ridges, timber pieces between horizontal underlay laps within roof slopes, and, where standard eaves vents are not used, ventilation through the soffit or open eaves.
Did you find this article useful? Why not join the SPAB and learn more about historic buildings from our quarterly magazine Cornerstone or make a donation to support our work in protecting historic and fragile buildings.
Further Reading
Roof Slating and Tiling, by F Bennett and A Pinion, Donhead, 2000 (reprint of 1948 edition)
© Douglas Kent 2006